Built by SOUTH

Conditioning: You’re Doing It Wrong


Conditioning: You’re Doing It Wrong

“Oh no she dih-int!”

Oh yes…yes I did.  I went there.  And I just called your ass out.

Energy systems training, or “conditioning” as many people call it, is a subject that seems to be more misunderstood than a 15 year old emo kid with Southern Baptist parents.

In the 80’s and 90’s, step aerobics classes, Jazzercise, and “sweatin’ to the oldies” with Richard Simmons were all the rage.   Women everywhere strapped on their thong leotards and legwarmers and got their sweat on daily for 60-90 minutes.  Anything and everything associated with the words “aerobics” was IN.

Then somewhere in the late 90’s to early 2000’s, it seems that the fitness community stumbled upon this new, amazing trend called “high intensity interval training” or (HIIT) as most of us know it, and all of sudden, “aerobics” AND anything associated with the word “aerobic” was demonized.

Misinterpretations of the TABATA study had everyone convinced that all you need is 4 minutes of HIIT intervals and you were good to go.  We were convinced that it was the best for fat loss, it was great for your conditioning levels, and you definitely didn’t need any of that long, slow aerobic bull you used to do.

In fact, anyone doing any conditioning work for more than 10-20 minutes was considered a silly hamster trudging along on their wheel, getting little to no benefit, while all of the super smart, awesome, in-the-know people were done with their workouts in no time.  How do I know this?  Because I totally felt this way and remember having these exact conversations with my “fitness expert friends.”


So, before we launch into a discussion about energy systems, let’s first identify the different energy systems.  They are as follows:

  1. Alactic (ATP-CP)
  2. Lactic (Glycolytic)
  3. Aerobic (Oxidative)

For years, it was thought that the alactic system would kick in for the first 30 seconds of intense work, then the glycolytic system would take over the for next 90 seconds, and anything longer than 2 minutes was using the oxidative/aerobic energy system. In fact, this is exactly what I thought until I watched two of my friends and colleagues present on energy systems training.  The first was Joel Jamieson‘s presentation on energy systems at the Midwest Performance Enhancement Seminar, and Eric Oetter presenting on energy systems at the Diagnosis Fitness Seminar.  You may have heard of Joel and his website, 8weeksout.com.  If you haven’t heard of Eric yet, just give it a couple of years.  You will.

As Joel and Eric discussed, more current research shows that all three energy systems actually start at the exact same time (the onset of activity), but they simply contribute to energy production at different levels based on the duration of the activity, the length of the recovery period, and the number of bouts of activity.

For example, a 1999 study by Parolin et al., had subjects sprint (cycle) for three 30 second bouts, followed by a four minute rest period.  The graph below shows that the predominant energy system used for the bouts of sprinting, changes wildly from sprint 1 (graph A) to sprint 3 (graph B).

Graph 1

While you can clearly see that the oxidative/aerobic energy system is required to contribute more significantly more quickly in the third sprint (graph B) than in the first (graph A), what is even more shocking is how the lactic/glycolytic energy system is virtually nonexistent by the third sprint.  By the third sprint, it’s primarily the alactic energy system and the oxidative energy system producing energy, with very little contribution from the lactic/glycolytic energy system.

To give you another example of the decrease in the contribution from the lactic energy system with repeated bouts of intervals, below is a graph from an article on Joel Jamieson’s website entitled, Research Review: Energy Systems, Interval Training, & RSA, written by Eric Oetter, who was mentioned above.

Graph 2

This graph displays the results of a study conducted where researchers asked the subjects to perform 10 six-second intervals with a 30-second recovery period.  The results from the first sprint are represented in the pie chart on the left, and then tenth sprint on the right.  Between the first sprint, and the tenth, you can see the huge decrease in the energy production by the lactic energy system that I mentioned above, and the large increase in the energy production from the alactic energy system, namely creatine phosphate (PCr).

So what about the aerobic/oxidative energy system?  I’ve been discussing it a lot.  How does it come into play, you might wonder…

The answer: the aerobic system is actually regenerating the creatine phosphate that’s being used to fuel the sprint.  So even though it’s the alactic energy system that’s producing the energy for the sprint, without proper development of the aerobic energy system, creatine phosphate couldn’t be regenerated as quickly, and performance would suffer. You would dip into your glycolytic energy system more quickly, and fatigue more quickly.  Your body’s only option for dealing with a poorly developed oxidative energy system where creatine phosphate can’t be regenerated quickly during repeated bouts of activity, is to decrease your power output, thus impeding your performance.

Learn more about Molly at MollyGalbraith.com, GirlsGoneStrong.com and J-Mstrength.com

Learn more about Molly at MollyGalbraith.com, GirlsGoneStrong.com and J-Mstrength.com

Considering that many of you reading this website compete in powerlifting, strongman, football, weightlifting, or other sports that require you to exert a high amount of energy over a short time period, with incomplete recovery, hopefully you can see that having a relatively well-developed oxidative energy system is beneficial to maintaining your power output.

***Obviously you don’t always train this way, but many training programs, including The Juggernaut Method 2.0 call for shorter rest periods and training with incomplete recovery.

Of course, as we all know, our body is constantly competing for resources and the last thing you want to do is devote the majority of your time to steady state aerobic training, and that is not at all what I am suggesting.  What I *am* suggesting, however, is to spending some time building a solid aerobic/oxidative energy system foundation, and then simply do enough to maintain that foundation over time.

One thing to keep in mind, is that the aerobic/oxidative energy system foundation that you require to excel in your sport/activity, is in direct correlation to the type of sport/activity you compete in.  Clearly, an ultra-marathoner or competitive cyclist would need a much better aerobic foundation than a powerlifter or olympic lifter, whereas someone competing in CrossFit would fall somewhere in between.

Depending on what your aerobic base looks like when you start developing this foundation, most people can get to where they want to be in about 6-8 weeks, as long as their efforts are consistent.

A great time to focus on developing this base would be: after a powerlifting or strongman competition, when you know your next competition is 5-6 months away, or immediately post-season if you are a football player or other seasonal athlete.

Competitors in sports like powerlifting and weightlifting, which don’t have a significant aerobic component to their competitions, still will benefit from including aerobic capacity work into their training. Aerobic based training will raise the athlete’s general work capacity, allowing them to perform more high quality work within a training session. Improved aerobic capacity will also help strength/power athletes recover faster between intensive training sessions. Finally, improved general fitness through aerobic capacity development will help you perform at a higher level during lengthy competitions, like when you are getting on the platform for a 3rd attempt deadlift during an 8 hour powerlifting meet.

Now I am not suggesting that you spend 6-8 weeks doing strictly distance running (blech!) or other slow cardio, or completely slacking off on your strength training; but every athlete can benefit from taking planned periods of time away from training intensely for their specific sport, especially after intense competition.  Athletes need to take time to repair and heal their bodies, so they can come back stronger and more prepared for their next competition/competitive season.

In Part 2 of this article, I am going outline:

–        Specific training methods for improving your oxidative energy system

–        Sample conditioning workouts

–        A general outline for an 8 week training program to help build a better aerobic base

Stay tuned!

Molly Galbraith is a rapidly rising young trainer who is quickly making a name for herself in the fitness industry.  She is a strength coach and co-­‐owner of J&M Strength and Conditioning, a rapidly expanding, private studio gym in Lexington, Kentucky that’s quickly becoming the go-­‐to place for professional athletes and the general public alike. In less than 18 months, they have gone from renting space at a local gym, to opening their own 7,500 sq. foot facility.  
Molly is also co-founder of the wildly popular Girls Gone Strong group, a movement dedicated to changing the way women train. She has also been an expert contributor to magazines like Oxygen and Experience Life.   No stranger to the gym herself, she has competed in both figure and powerlifting and boasts a 275 lb. squat, a 165 lb. bench press, and a 341 lb. deadlift.
WebsiteFacebookYouTubeTwitterHer Butt’s Twitter

12 Responses to “Conditioning: You’re Doing It Wrong”

April 09, 2013 at 2:21 pm, B_Kohler said:

“a subject that seems to be more misunderstood than a 15 year old emo kid with Southern Baptist parents.” ~ That is great!!!


April 09, 2013 at 3:01 pm, Mike Jamea said:

If your nutrient transportation system is crap, you’re fighting an uphill battle. It’s like you said, you don’t need to be a marathoner to have good circulation and aerobic capacity. It’s all about when and how you apply it in order to replenish your systems accordingly. This is why powerlifters should encorporate speed days, prowler/sled work, and good old fashioned airdyne efforts to “flush” the system and prevent any pockets of limited blood flow. A warmed body and a body that can kick into gear will definitely allow for repeated bursts of ATP-PCr power stroking to occur at a higher intensity! Good job on calling out those with horse blinders on!


April 09, 2013 at 5:13 pm, Cardio, The Aerobic System, and You (Or, Why LSD Works for Me) | JR NovaFit said:

[…] reading a very interesting (and very technical) article about conditioning, things finally […]


April 09, 2013 at 8:54 pm, Joe DeLeo said:

Hi Molly,

Great post. I agree with you. All three energy systems are always engaged. The magnitude of each system is dependent on as you quote”As Joel and Eric discussed, more current research shows that all three energy systems actually start at the exact same time (the onset of activity), but they simply contribute to energy production at different levels based on the duration of the activity, the length of the recovery period, and the number of bouts of activity.”

However, I’d also clarify that intensity primarily, then duration secondarily dicates which energy system is used. Having a deep aerobic base allows you to recover between HIIT and maintain that high intensity.

This is why you see world class athletes such as rowers have an ENORMOUS aerobic base even though their race is only 6-7 minutes depending on boat class. Why? Well, if you are in a 1x you will race 4 x 2km during the Olympics. You have to be able to recover between from flat out efforts. A well developed aerobic base is the only thing that will allow you to do so.

HIIT or AT work is a spice that should be methodically added to any training progression. It is also dependent heavily on the physiology of the athlete depending on muscle fiber composition and their “system”.

Once again great job, you are right on here. Would love to have further conversations on this. @JDeLeo on twitter!


April 11, 2013 at 5:57 pm, Icithis said:

These figures are quite small, and it is difficult to ‘clearly see’ what you’re referring to in the figures.


April 11, 2013 at 9:46 pm, Chad Smith said:

If you click on the pictures of them, they should expand.


April 12, 2013 at 5:10 pm, Adam Rees said:

Is that Kevin James spotting you?? Haha.


April 13, 2013 at 1:14 am, Chad Smith said:

Ouch dude…that’s me


April 13, 2013 at 2:00 am, Danny C said:

This may be something you’ll address in part II, but I’m wondering what degree of specificity is required for there to be a carryover from the aerobic work to alactic and lactic activities. For instance, would having a strong aerobic base from cycling have a significant impact on the creatine phosphate recovery system in between bouts of 200m sprints?


April 17, 2013 at 8:17 pm, A really good article about conditioning & your aerobic base | Eclectic Kettlebell said:

[…] Conditioning: You’re Doing It Wrong by Molly Galbraith (Article from Juggernaut Training Systems) […]


May 31, 2013 at 4:48 am, Cardio: “What?…You mean like, lift weights faster?” | BEAUTY POWER GRACE said:

[…] because a true inspiration of mine, Molly Galbraith of “Girls Gone Strong” wrote an article also attacking this controversial subject. Though she gets pretty scientific with heavy jargon and […]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *